The bill does not eliminate the disparity, but dramatically reduces it. The fair sentencing act of 2010 was an act of congress that was signed into federal law by u. Specifically, congress directed the sentencing commission to report on the current federal structure of. The general assembly eliminated the sentencing disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine by increasing the trigger quantity for crack cocaine to onehalf ounce approximately 14. After a decade of contentious debate regarding the federal sentencing disparities between crack cocaine and powder cocaine, a number of significant initiatives to reform current.
Jan 02, 2020 bookers bill would eliminate the crack cocaine sentencing disparity by reducing it from 18. Despite the fact that the chemical structure of powder cocaine and crack cocaine is nearly identical, the punishment for crack possession or sales is far greater than that of cocaine. Mar 31, 2020 sentencing disparities between crack cocaine vs. Until now, there was a sentencing disparity of 100.
The federal antidrug abuse act of 1986, part of the war on drugs, established a disparity between the amount of crack and powdered cocaine. Disparity in sentencing for crack vs powder cocaine. Douglas berman, law professor at ohio state university, talks with michele norris about how the disparity in sentencing minimums between crack and powdered cocaine. This is often what people are referring to when they mention drug related sentencing disparities. Federal sentencing disparity, 20052012, examines patterns of federal sentencing disparity among white and black offenders, by sentence received, and looks at judicial variation in sentencing. The 1986 law created a 100 to 1 disparity between the sentencing guidelines for crack and powder cocaine. Crack cocaine became prevalent in the mid1980s and received massive media attention due in part to its exponential growth in the drug market. How many states maintain sentencing disparities between crack and powder cocaine.
The fair sentencing act was a step forward, but it did not finish the job. For more information on federal laws on cocaine possession, see cocaine. The sentencing disparities between crack and cocaine attn. Eliminate the crack versus cocaine sentencing disparity. This report addresses disparities in cocaine sentencing in states and documents efforts at the federal and state level to correct these injustices.
Dec 19, 20 president cites sentencing disparities between crack and powder cocaine new legislation has reduced sentencing disparities previously%2c obama had commuted only one sentence in the five years of. In 2010, president obama signed the fair sentencing act, which reduced the federal penalty ratios from 100. Crack cocaine first hit the national radar in 1986 but, contrary to media reports, it was not a new drug. Holly mitchells senate bill 1010, which would reduce the sentence for possession of crack cocaine for sale from 35 years to 24 years, thus matching the penalties for powder.
Congress passed the fair sentencing act to make punishments for crack and cocaine more equal. That year, national news outlets began reporting inflammatory anecdotes supposedly revealing a crack epidemic. The commission reported in 2004 that revising the crack cocaine thresholds would better reduce the sentencing gap than any other single policy change, and it would dramatically improve the fairness of the federal sentencing. Before this law was passed, the united states had a 100to1 crack topowder cocaine sentencing disparity. The explosive popularity of crack cocaine was associated with its cheap price, which for the first time made cocaine available to a wider economic class. Clinton signs bill to disapprove of equalizing crack. Iowa during 2003, the iowa legislature lowered its sentencing disparity from. Regardless of changes in the federal law, a charge of crack or powder cocaine is a very serious charge. Congress moves to narrow sentencing disparities for crack.
Misguided drug laws and draconian sentencing have produced profoundly unequal outcomes for communities of color. Today states maintain sentencing disparities between crack and powder cocaine offenses. Activists argue that the current rules are too harsh. Similarly, those carrying ten grams of crack cocaine. Sentencing disparity primary sources topics in criminal. Since congress recognized the gaping racial disparity between mandatory minimum sentences for crack offenses and cocaine offenses and reduced the ratio from 100to1 to 18to1, courts have grappled with when and how to apply the statute to alreadydecided cases.
Supreme court ruled that the reductions in the fair sentencing act applied to at least those cases decided before. The fair sentencing act 2010 reduced sentencing disparities to 18. The house of representatives passed a bill on wednesday that would reduce the disparities between mandatory federal sentences for crack and powder cocaine. The us house of representatives approved a bill, sb 1789 on july 28. In 2010 congress passed the fair sentencing act, which repealed the mandatory minimum sentence for simple possession and reduced the sentencing disparity from 100. The sentencing project cracked justice crack cocaine.
Because crack and powder cocaine are two forms of the same drug, there should not be any disparity in sentencing between crack and powder cocaine offenses the only truly fair ratio is 1. Falsely treating crack cocaine as 50 times more addictive than powder cocaine, as congress did more than in creating the 100toone quantity ratio, has implications beyond that of mere unfair sentencing. Crack users were at a higher risk than powder cocaine users for reporting multiple recent arrests or a lifetime arrest. Obama commutes 8 crack cocaine sentences usa today. A comprehensive examination of the 100to1 crack versus powder cocaine sentencing disparity under which distribution of just 5 grams of crack carries a. Bernie sanders called for the same in 2015, prompting his democratic presidential rival. This is the united states sentencing commissions first report to congress on the subject of federal cocaine sentencing policy. Congress is considering a bill to change drug laws that punish crack cocaine violations more severely than those for powder cocaine.
Today, states maintain sentencing disparities between crack and powder cocaine offenses. Feb 19, 2015 specifically, the penalty for possessing 500g of powder cocaine was comparable to possessing only 5g of crack. Data show racial disparity in crack sentencing us news. There are federal guidelines ensuring that people who get caught with crack are sentenced more harshly than those who are caught with.
Regrettably, the majority opted instead to perpetuate these discriminatory laws by passing and reporting out h. A comprehensive examination of the 100to1 crack versus powder cocaine sentencing disparity under which distribution of just 5 grams of crack carries a minimum 5year federal prisonsentence, while distribution of 500 grams of powder cocaine carries the same 5year mandatory minimum sentence. Now, the ten year sentence is triggered by 280 grams of crack instead of 50. Bookers bill would eliminate the crack cocaine sentencing disparity by reducing it from 18.
In fiscal year 2010, before the passage of the fair sentencing act, almost 4,000 defendants, mainly black, received mandatory minimum sentences for crack cocaine. Aug 04, 2010 until now, there was a sentencing disparity of 100. In 1995 the commission concluded that the violence associated with. The drug war drives racial disparities in the criminal justice system. But during negotiations it became clear that congress was in agreement. The legislation also eliminates the mandatory minimum for simple possession of crack cocaine. Assistant majority leader dick durbin dil introduced the fair sentencing act of 2009, a narrowlytailored bill that would eliminate the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine and increase penalties for the worst offenders. Data show racial disparity in crack sentencing congress passed the fair sentencing act to make punishments for crack and cocaine more equal. Regardless of changes in the federal law, a charge of crack or powder cocaine. A 2015 study published in the journal drug and alcohol dependence examined the socioeconomic disparities among powder cocaine users and crack users. Federal sentencing disparity, 20052012, examines patterns of federal sentencing disparity among white and black offenders, by sentence received, and looks at judicial variation in sentencing since booker vs. In spite of arguments upholding sentencing differences between crack and powdercocaine, proponents against such disparities need only to.
Jul 01, 2014 in 2010, president obama signed the fair sentencing act, which reduced the federal penalty ratios from 100. After president obama signed off on new legislation to reduce the sentencing disparity between people caught with crack cocaine and those caught with powder cocaine, the minnesota democrat spoke to huffpost about what it all means. Crack cocaine sentencing policy prison policy initiative. People of color experience discrimination at every stage of the criminal justice system and are more likely to be stopped, searched, arrested, convicted, harshly. Disparity in sentencing for crack vs powder cocaine essay. The 100to1 crack cocaine to powder cocaine quantity ratio is a primary cause of the growing disparity between sentences for black and white federal defendants, the commission wrote. Keith ellison spent 16 years as a trial lawyer dealing with hundreds of cases involving cocaine arrests. Additionally, commissioners voted on provisions of the fair sentencing act, which recently reduced the disparities in penalties between powder and crack cocaine, for some prisoners already serving. The commission establishes sentencing policies and practices for the federal courts. The new law significantly reduces the cocaine sentencing quantity disparity from 100 to 1 to 18 to 1 by raising the quantity of crack cocaine necessary to trigger the five and tenyear mandatory minimum sentences first set in 1986. Crack and cocaine powder sentencing disparities essay. Specifically, the penalty for possessing 500g of powder cocaine was comparable to possessing only 5g of crack. Download 32page term paper on sentencing disparities between crack cocaine vs. More than 80 percent of federal prisoners serving crack cocaine sentences are black.
Whereas, proposals to remove the federal mandatory minimums for crack and powder cocaine, and to otherwise eliminate the disparity for crack and powder cocaine by sentencing crack in the same manner that powder cocaine is currently sentenced, would threaten efforts to investigate and prosecute significant and violent drug offenders that deal. After cocaine and baking soda are combined, the mixture is boiled, and a solid forms. Apr 17, 2020 download page term paper on disparity in sentencing for crack vs. Jul 28, 2019 the 100to1 crack cocaine to powder cocaine quantity ratio is a primary cause of the growing disparity between sentences for black and white federal defendants, the commission wrote. Some 2020 democratic candidate argue that the sentencing disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine, which now sits at 18to1. Support fair and rational sentencing by eliminating the. Before 1986, federal sentencing laws treated possession of crack and powder cocaine the same. How an early biden crime bill created the sentencing. President barack obama on august 3, 2010 that reduced the disparity between the amount of crack cocaine and powder cocaine needed to trigger certain federal criminal penalties from a 100. Aug 03, 2010 data show racial disparity in crack sentencing congress passed the fair sentencing act to make punishments for crack and cocaine more equal. It eliminates the disparity in federal sentencing for crack versus powder cocaine offenses, without a shift in the current powder cocaine penalty. So, the federal law still imposes a different and harsher sentence for crack cocaine possession than it does for powder cocaine possession, but the disparity is not nearly as great as under the 1986 act.
What is crack cocaine differences between crack and cocaine. Under what is commonly referred to as the 100to1 cocaine sentencing disparity, it takes one hundred times as much powder cocaine as crack cocaine to trigger the federal mandatory minimums. Africanamericans now serve virtually as much time in prison for a drug offense 58. This guide highlights the incredible breadth, depth and reliability of government information on this topic. American drug laws make it pretty clear that our legal system thinks crack is extra whack. Human rights watch wrote the following letter expressing support of california state senate bill sb 1010 which would reduce the disparities in penalties between crack and powder cocaine. Powder cocaine after a decade of contentious debate regarding the federal sentencing disparities between crack cocaine and powder cocaine, a number of significant initiatives to reform current policy have recently emerged. Congress directed the united states sentencing commission to study federal sentencing policy as it relates to possession and distribution of all forms of cocaine. A 2010 federal law rectified some, though not all, of the sentencing disparities.
For instance, there are federal guidelines ensuring that people who get caught with crack are sentenced more harshly than those who are caught with powder cocaine. This disparity between crack and powder cocaine was driven by fear, instead of by research, of the intensity and perceived dangers of crack cocaine. Congress passed laws that created a 100 to 1 sentencing disparity for the possession or trafficking of crack when compared to penalties for trafficking of powder cocaine, which had been widely criticized as discriminatory against minorities, mostly africanamericans, who were more likely to use crack than powder cocaine. In the mid 80s, congress passed the antidrug abuse act of 1986. This disparity has had a hugely unfair and racially discriminatory impact on minority americans. In a statement in the congressional record, breaux said he was honestly shocked to learn of the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine. Feb 22, 2015 we wrote this paper to inform the public and congress about the disparities in the sentencing laws between crack and powder cocaine, which continue to have profound legal and social. Since the law went into effect, the ratio dropped to 18to1. Crack cocaine disparity, the fair sentencing act 2010.
The 100to1 cocaine sentencing disparity remained the law of the land until 2010 with the passage of the fair sentencing act, which reduced the sentencing disparity between crack. Chief among these is the racial outcome of the sentencing disparity. Federal crack cocaine sentencing the sentencing project. The adaa created a 100toone ratio between the quantity of crack versus powder cocaine needed to trigger mandatory minimum sentencing. Jan 29, 2019 crack and power cocaine sentencing disparities.
Cracking the racial disparity for cocaine sentencing center. The amount of powder cocaine necessary to trigger the sentence is still five kilos. The answer to the problem presented by this wide difference in penalties is not to lower penalties for selling crack cocaine but to increase the penalties for selling powder cocaine, the. Fair sentencing act american civil liberties union. It also brings crack sentencing in line with powder cocaine, as well as with all other drugs, by applying mandatory minimums only to dealers and not those convicted of simple possession. As a result, the bill lessening the disparity to 18. Until 2010, this sentencing disparity was 100 to 1, which means that while just 5 grams of crack would carry a 5year mandatory minimum. Cocaine is a hydrochloride salt in its powdered form, while crack cocaine is derived from powdered cocaine by combining it with water and another substance, usually baking soda sodium bicarbonate.
915 72 228 245 539 1366 1140 106 131 954 425 1008 1264 645 1425 794 188 333 624 608 647 828 905 387 1436 17 830 54 164 698 974 1467